GM regulations hold back innovation, say UK researchers


- Last updated on GMT

New crops should be assessed on their traits, rather than the techniques used to produce them, the BBSRC has urged
New crops should be assessed on their traits, rather than the techniques used to produce them, the BBSRC has urged

Related tags Gm crops Agriculture Genetically modified food

Current European restrictions on genetically modified (GM) crops could hold back crop innovation needed to ensure food security, claims a UK government-funded research body.

In a new position statement, the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) says the EU’s precautionary approach to GM technologies could have huge costs, inhibiting potentially important crop developments in the face of rising agricultural demand – as well as costs associated with testing for the presence of GM material in imports.

“While it is important to guard against the notion of a simple “technological fix” to the many challenges facing agriculture, it is equally important to reap the benefits of available and emerging technologies where they can contribute effectively,”​ the paper said.

BBSRC experts advocate assessing the safety of new crop varieties according to their characteristics, rather than the method by which they were produced.

They argue that this would result in “more effective and robust regulation”​ than the current system, because it may be impossible to detect whether a specific breeding technique has been used. Currently, several GM crops are not approved for cultivation but can be imported into Europe, and unintentional presence of GM material is tolerated at a level of up to 0.9% in other crops. 

In particular, the BBSRC highlights emerging crop breeding technologies such as genome editing, which allows precise swapping or deletion of specific plant traits.

“The boundaries between established genetic modification (GM) and non-GM techniques will become increasingly blurred as techniques develop,”​ they wrote. “…A trait-based regulatory system would allow more meaningful debate about agricultural priorities. Many of the concerns raised about GM crops are not related to the technique used but rather to the traits that have been introduced.”

Public concerns about GM crops tend to fall into two main categories, claims the paper – general concerns over how traits are selected for market release and how they are marketed, and specific concerns about the potential impacts of certain traits.

“A trait-based regulatory system would focus the discussion explicitly on both these factors​,” the paper said.

BBSRC chief executive, Professor Jackie Hunter, said: "There is no doubt that improved crop varieties will be produced using these new methods around the world and commercialised in countries outside of the EU. If we want the UK and the EU to continue to be world-leading in this area, we must ensure there is appropriate regulation in this changing landscape."

Only two GM crops have been approved for cultivation in Europe – Monsanto’s MON810 corn, and BASF’s Amflora potato.

The position paper is available online here​.

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Take Control with Predictive Modeling from Corbion

Take Control with Predictive Modeling from Corbion

Content provided by Corbion | 26-Apr-2024 | White Paper

Increased demand for uncured, higher pH formulations and natural products has made the challenge of controlling Listeria difficult. The good news: the...

Replace Synthetic Preservatives

Replace Synthetic Preservatives

Content provided by Corbion | 08-Apr-2024 | Insight Guide

With 36% of European consumers wary of food additives, particularly preservatives 1, offering a clean label is crucial. Corbion provides a better way...


Excessive tolerance of this nonsense!

Posted by Harryonthehill,

How much longer do we, the quiet if not silent majority have to put up with the nonsense disseminated by the likes of Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth and The Soil Association who all have their own axes to grind? The science behind GM crop breeding is if anything rather lower risk than most conventional breeding techniques and offers enormous potential in being able to induce traits that will help to produce crops that are higher yielding and more nutritious. To object to 'Golden Rice' being developed is tantamount to being evil as it prevents a perfectly acceptable solution to Vitamin A deficiency being made available to those who need it most. The organisations above should hang their heads in shame.

Report abuse

Science or Misticism?

Posted by Harryonthehill,

One of the reasons we are having this 'debate' is that too few pupils study the sciences sufficiently well to understand how science works. Hence there is extra suspicion placed on people who have valid evidence to support certain strategies like biotech plant breeding. Ask the vast majority of people to explain how statistical significance works or how plant breeders produce mutations and I doubt more than 5% will have any idea. Socrates described democracy as a system by which two idiots can out vote one expert! Democracy is unquestionably the right system for politics in general but for specialisms we need to rely on those with the appropriate expertise. That is unless one wants to be guided by the tea leaves in the bottom of your cup!

Report abuse

GMOs in food

Posted by Brent Erickson,

Good and thoughtful piece in the post this morning in the food section of the Washington Post

Report abuse

Follow us


View more