Farmers hit back as BBC documentary exposes meat production’s ‘devastating effect on ecosystems’

By Oliver Morrison contact

- Last updated on GMT

Pic: iStock/rekbit
Pic: iStock/rekbit

Related tags: Meat, Environment, Sustainability, Soil, plant-based

We need to distinguish between the livestock systems and meats that are part of the problem, and those that are part of the solution, say farmers as BBC documentary suggests that consumers should cut their meat consumption for environmental reasons.

UK farmers have defended the livestock industry ahead of the broadcast of the BBC 1 documentary, ‘Meat, A Threat to Our Planet?’ due to be broadcast on 25 November. In the documentary, animal biologist Liz Bonnin investigates the environmental impact of animals being raised to supply the world's demand for meat, and looks at efforts designed to reduce the effects.

She begins her journey in Texas, on a vast intensive farm with 50,000 cows, which emit huge amounts of methane, an incredibly potent greenhouse gas that is contributing to climate change. At a university in California, she hears of the efforts of scientists to better understand a cow's digestion so that they can reduce methane emissions.

She told What’s On TV magazine: “In the last 50 years the global cattle population has increased by 400 million, the number of pigs has doubled and the number of chickens has increased five-fold, and all to keep up with our meat-eating demands.

“This is having a devastating effect on our ecosystems as more and more land is being used for meat production, intensive farming is polluting our rivers with animal waste and the ever increasing number of livestock is contributing to global warming.”

‘Grazing ruminant animals​ can rebuild​ soil fertility and carbon stocks’

But Patrick Holden, CEO of the Sustainable Food Trust (SFT), said there needed to be a differentiation ‘between the livestock systems and meats that are part of the problem, and those that are part of the solution’.​ 
 
"There is no doubt that grain fed, intensively farmed livestock, including those found in feed-lots in the USA, are hugely damaging to the environment and public health, and for this reason should be phased out entirely,”​ he said.
 
However, he added that sustainable agriculture represented one of the most ‘significant opportunities to mitigate irreversible climate change, primarily through the regeneration of our soils’. Grazing ruminant animals (including cattle and sheep), have a critically important role to play in rebuilding our soil fertility and carbon stocks, he said.
 
“We must move away from the prominent models of intensive, often monoculture systems which rely heavily on chemical inputs, towards more regenerative, mixed farming models, that integrate the production of plants for human consumption with natural soil fertility building phases within rotations.

“This can include the introduction of cover cropping and grass, which when grazed in a sustainable way can not only produce food we can eat, in the form of grass fed meat and dairy, but also improve the fertility of our soils.”​ 
 
He added that of course, sustainable livestock products should form part of a balanced diet. “Whilst we must all be striving to eat more plants, just as importantly as scrutinising where our animal products come from, we must also question the provenance and wider impact of the plants we eat. Are, for example, imported soy or palm oil products, or highly processed meat alternatives, better than eating something we can produce in a sustainable way on our doorstep? 
 
"By aligning our diets with the productive capacity of the sustainable farming systems in the area in which we live, we can have a significant impact on shifting the balance of financial advantage towards the type of farming systems we need to mitigate climate change, as well as reducing pollution, increasing levels of biodiversity and most importantly, improving public health."

‘UK meat production should increase’ 

Stuart Roberts, NFU Vice President, told the BBC’s Farming Today​ programme: “You don’t have to read too many newspapers every day to get another knock from those who say we should stop eating meat.”​ But the UK livestock industry has a positive story to tell, he said: “Our carbon footprint here is two and half times lower than the global average." ​He added that the UK meat industry should look to produce ‘more than its fair share of red meat for the global population’. “We’ve got a really competitive advantage going forward with our sustainable production systems.”

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Bring alive the colours of meat, naturally

Bring alive the colours of meat, naturally

Kancor Ingredients Limited | 27-Mar-2019 | Technical / White Paper

Addition of colour makes food more attractive and appetising. But usage of natural colours always come with technical challenges such as heat stability,...

How to find textural perfection in meat alternatives

How to find textural perfection in meat alternatives

Stable Micro Systems | 25-Mar-2019 | Technical / White Paper

An increase in vegetarian diets has led to a rise in demand for meat alternatives. Replicating the texture of meat is vital to consumer enjoyment, but...

Related suppliers

6 comments

Show more

Am I reading the same article?

Posted by Stephen Evans,

From the article there are clear distinctions to be made between intensive farming in North/South America which causes deforestation of the rainforest etc and grass fed cattle in the UK which have a significantly lower impact, which is the focus of the article. This is not denying the impacts of cattle farming worldwide but I think it is important to make these distinctions, as those who are likely to listen probably already source meat that hasn't traveled halfway around the world, and hence tarnishing all cattle farming as the same may just impact on those producing the lowest impact meat and do nothing to impact the sort of farming that is causing deforestation etc

Report abuse

The status quo cannot be sustained

Posted by Tim Alexander,

Fabio: It's not an emotion based argument livestock production produces 14.5 percent of human-induced green house gas emissions. How is deforesting the Amazon taking care of our planet?

http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3437e.pdf

Report abuse

Prophets o the Apocalypse

Posted by Fabio,

Everyday, farmers, in every country around the world, do the wonderful job to produce food, enough food, lots of food, MEAT INCLUDED, that feed "zillions" of people three times a day!
Plenty of information available from serious, science-based, not emotion-based, sources demonstrate that agricultural and livestock production IS NOT responsible for the climate change and that eating meat is ESSENTIAL, CRUCIAL, VITAL FOR HEALTH AND LIFE!
Said that, I invite everybody, from wherever you are, to heartily thank and effusively applaud all farmers and ranchers, in every single corner of the world, for taking nice care of our planet, thru the use of sustainable production practices in their farms, and, mostly, for taking nice care of our health and life thru the abundant, varied, delicious and nourishing food, MEAT INCLUDED, they carefully produce everyday!
In time: don't you eat meat? That's fine and I respect the option. But, please, don't try to convince me to do so! Respect ME!

Report abuse

Follow us

Featured Events

View more

Products

View more

Webinars