UK will not ‘shut up’ about chlorine-rinsed poultry after US complaints

By Will Chu

- Last updated on GMT

Words traded in US-UK chlorine-rinsed chicken spat ©iStock/alicjane
Words traded in US-UK chlorine-rinsed chicken spat ©iStock/alicjane

Related tags European union United kingdom Us

Claims that the US is “sick and tired” of the UK moaning about chlorine-rinsed chicken evoked a strong response from the food and farming alliance Sustain, who insisted the UK is “not going to shut up about it”.

Responding to comments​ made by Ted McKinney, undersecretary for trade at the US Department of Agriculture, Kath Dalmeny, Sustain’s chief executive questioned the US’ stance on the controversial approach and its related safety aspects.

“The US can’t seem to make up their minds,”​ she said in a statement. “First they insisted chlorine washed chicken was safe to eat, but now they’re saying they don’t really use chlorine anymore.

“At the same time, they’re telling us we need to abandon our food safety standards – like the EU ban on chlorine. Given their higher rates of food poisoning and overuse of farm antibiotics, we’d rather not have the US telling us what to eat, thank you very much.”  

The spat comes after McKinney’s comments were made during an interview at the Oxford Farming Conference in which he was also reported to have said that “the EU was a very difficult place to do business”.

On UK food safety regulations, he added: “We hope that as part of Brexit, the reset button can at least be considered.”

The conference, held annually at Oxford University, was also attended by UK Environment Minister Michael Gove, who insisted there would be no compromises of UK food standards​ to secure trade agreements with less regulated markets, such as the US.

Preserving UK quality reputation 

“Outside the EU, we could establish a measure of farm and food quality which would be world leading,”​ Gove said during a speech at the event.

“It would be foolish for us to lower animal welfare or environmental standards in any trade deal and, in doing so, undercut our own reputation for quality."

However, campaigners have expressed concerns that the UK government is adopting a different tone behind closed doors. Sustain's Dalmeny accusing Gove of making assurances to the US that the ongoing issue would soon be resolved.

“We’d also like to hear from Michael Gove on Mr McKinney’s claims that Mr Gove has privately assured US officials that he will draw a line under the dispute on the grounds that it’s not fair to American poultry producers.

“We can assure both Mr Gove and Mr McKinney that they may be sick and tired of hearing us talk about chlorine-rinsed chicken, but we’re not going to shut up about it.”

Much of the argument centres on the standards employed in the practice of washing chickens in a chlorine dioxide solution that is said to reduce the prevalence of Salmonella.

It is a practice adopted in the US but banned throughout Europe due to concerns over the possible formation of by-products as a result of chlorine break down.

“The point about their use of chlorine is that it is used to mask low animal welfare and poor farming standards, which the British public will just not accept,”​ Dalmeny insisted.

“Leaving the EU is an opportunity for us to build an even better food Britain; we should not have to lower our standards to strike trade deals.”

US: Compromise needed

Relations between the two countries hit a low point late last year after a clash over food standards concerning US chlorine-treated poultry.

Wilbur Ross, US Commerce Secretary, said that a post-Brexit UK-US trade deal would only be possible if the UK abandoned EU standards.

In response, the UK’s Food Research Collaboration published a briefing paper​ comparing the UK and EU standards with those in the US. The authors found that animal carcasses were treated with disinfectants in the US because they are more contaminated with filth, including excrement, when compared to the UK’s supply chain.

But McKinney dismissed the suggestion that US poultry quality is lower than EU or UK standards. “We would like all of British society to understand that is not a practice that’s in use very much,”​ McKinney said at the Oxford Farming Conference. "The quality of our poultry, we’d put up against UK poultry any day of the week and twice on Sunday."

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

 Four actionable steps to reduce allergen recalls

Four actionable steps to reduce allergen recalls

Content provided by FoodChain ID | 10-Oct-2023 | White Paper

Failing to mitigate allergen risks has serious consequences - not just for consumer safety, poor allergen procedures can also cause financial losses and...

Is your brand reputation at risk?

Is your brand reputation at risk?

Content provided by FoodChain ID | 21-Sep-2023 | White Paper

FoodChain ID has developed a new white paper, “Current Food Supply Chain Threats - Is Your Company's Brand Reputation at Risk?” examining recent regulatory...

1 comment

Chlorine and Cruelty in Poultry

Posted by Karen Davis,

Regarding chlorine, I can't speak for Britain or the EU but I can say that US poultry production is filthy in all ways and that chlorine has always been used to mask the dirty pathogenic mess. People should forget about eating chickens and turkeys and move toward plant-powered meals free of animal products, because locally and globally animal production is cruel, obscene, and irresponsible. There is no justification for bringing an animal into this world to suffer and die miserably for "food" no one needs in order to be healthy. At this moment, chickens are freezing to death in the transport trucks on the Eastern Shore of the US and elsewhere. In the summer they die of heat stroke, and at all times they are dying of massive heart failure and other manmade diseases. The entire business is inexcusable.

Report abuse

Follow us


View more