Consumers buy more when recommended serving sizes are smaller

By Will Chu

- Last updated on GMT

Nutrition values seen on labels can differ substantially based on the recommended serving size (Photo credit: iStock.com)
Nutrition values seen on labels can differ substantially based on the recommended serving size (Photo credit: iStock.com)

Related tags: Portion sizes, Nutrition

Nutrition values seen on labels can differ substantially based on the recommended serving size, with consumers buying more of the same product among one of a number of undesirable consumer behaviours, researchers have found.

The researchers found that shoppers bought more yoghurt when the recommended serving size was smaller. This may have few consequences as a relatively healthy food but may be cause for concern with snacks like chocolate bars.

Writing in the first edition of the Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, ​the researchers recorded millions of food purchases in European supermarkets before and after the introduction of a front-of-pack nutrition label.

Optimized-BSE infographic
Portion sizes,packaging, labelling, advertising, and the unit size all influence the purchase of a food product (credit: Journal of the Association for Consumer Research)

The data collected was spread over two years and covered 61 products from the healthy (yoghurt) to the unhealthy (cookies) category.

“When the serving becomes smaller this will decrease the nutritional values on the label,”​ lead author Dr. Ossama Elshiewy from the University of Goettingen explained to us. “If you ignore this fact you might compare calorie information that is not comparable.”

“People might infer that these products are healthier,”​ co-author Dr Steffen Jahn, also from the University of Goettingen added. “So next time take care and check the recommended serving size on the label. This will prevent you from understanding nutrition content and make your purchases healthier.”

Portion sizes of many foods have increased over the last 30 years with concern that this may be one factor that has contributed to obesity rates. Portion sizes are among a number of factors that influence the purchase of a food product, with packaging, labelling, advertising, and the unit size of equal importance.

While the blame has been firmly placed on the food industry’s doorstep, consumers themselves have resisted the introduction of smaller portion sizes, with value for money an important motivator.

In the U.S, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is keen to update the Nutrition Facts Panel (NFP) on packaged foods to improve understanding and recently took steps to recommend a uniform, front-of-package (FOP) labelling system that the food and beverage industries could take on.

In addition, as part of the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act a menu labelling mandate was added that would require chain restaurants to provide calorie information on restaurant menus at the point-of-purchase.

Source: The Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, Vol 1:1 2016

“Seduced by the Label: How the Recommended Serving Size on Nutrition Labels Affects Food Sales.”

Authors: Elshiewy, Ossama, Steffen Jahn and Yasemin Boztug

Related products

show more

Explore the EXBERRY® Oil Dispersible range

Explore the EXBERRY® Oil Dispersible range

EXBERRY® by GNT | 19-Jan-2021 | Technical / White Paper

Bring your fat-based applications to life with GNT’s newly expanded oil-dispersible range. GNT has extended its range of oil-dispersible Coloring Foods...

Big surprises in Ipsos survey of 6000 flexitarians

Big surprises in Ipsos survey of 6000 flexitarians

IFF (formerly DuPont Nutrition & Biosciences) | 30-Nov-2020 | Technical / White Paper

Flexitarians in 9 countries give a meal-by-meal account of their preferences. Discover what it takes to make plant-based part of every meal in our groundbreaking...

Related suppliers

Follow us

Products

View more

Webinars