Spanish watchdog upholds 'questionable' sugar claim

By Niamh Michail

- Last updated on GMT

"The present case is an example of how it can sometimes be wiser to perform your own assessment instead [of relying on advertising rulings], " says food lawyer  Lara Skoblikov.
"The present case is an example of how it can sometimes be wiser to perform your own assessment instead [of relying on advertising rulings], " says food lawyer Lara Skoblikov.

Related tags Codex alimentarius Nutrition

A Spanish advertising watchdog has upheld a ‘no added sugar’ claim for a dessert containing sweetened chocolate – a questionable interpretation and clear breach of EU law, warn food lawyers.

The label of the product in question, a chocolate-flavoured custard dessert called Natillas, states it has no added sugar and that the 6 g of sugar per 100 g serving are “naturally occurring in the milk and chocolate”.

Naturally-occurring sugar in chocolate?

This claim was challenged by consumer rights organisation, the Association of Communication Users, but the complaint was dismissed by Autocontrol, Spain's advertising regulatory body, which said the claim made by Spanish manufacturer Mercadona was in accordance with EU Regulation 1924/2006 on nutrition and health claims.

The Autocontrol ruling states: “After detailed examination of the advertising piece and given the evidence provided by the parties, this section must conclude that the promoted product has not [had] any


monosaccharide or disaccharide added to it, nor any other food used for its sweetening properties.”

But food lawyers have pointed out that as chocolate, as a compound ingredient in the dessert, contains added sugar as a sweetening ingredient, this puts Mercadona in breach of EU law.

An easy health halo?

So what does this ruling mean for other food manufacturers - is this an open door to easy 'no added sugar' claims that could add a coveted health halo to products?

Not really, says Lara Skoblikov, regulatory expert and partner at Food Compliance International, and companies certainly shouldn’t try to take the Spanish ruling as a precedent.

“The ruling is not binding and will be of little value to a food business manufacturer who has to defend itself in court for using the claim incorrectly. Food business operators are themselves responsible for compliance with food law. The lesson is to be careful with blindly applying rulings from self-regulatory bodies.”

She says the golden rule to follow for no added sugar claims is to ensure strict compliance with the conditions of use – that means no added mono- or disaccharides or any other food used for its sweetening properties.

There is no EU guidance on the meaning of ‘food used for its sweetening properties’ but in order to be on the safe side, she recommends using the Codex Alimentarius guidelines for use of nutrition and health claims as a safe harbor.

This states that a no added sugar claim can be used if “the food contains no ingredients that contain sugars as an ingredient (examples: jams, jellies, sweetened chocolate, sweetened fruit pieces, etc.)”.

Its full ruling can be read here​ (in Spanish) 

Related news

Related products

show more

Mastering taste challenges in good-for-you products

Mastering taste challenges in good-for-you products

Content provided by Symrise | 11-Sep-2023 | White Paper

When food and beverage manufacturers reduce sugar, salt, or fat and add fibers, minerals or vitamins, good-for-you products can suffer from undesirable...

Related suppliers

1 comment

Negligence by any other name...

Posted by Argemir,

If you read carefully to the reasoning the ruling provides you will be disappointed: there is no substantiation behind it. They consider that sugar was not added since they had not added it directly (and obviously disregard the fact it had been added to the chocolate). On top of that they did not ask any proof to discern if the sugar in the chocolate did bring any sweet taste to the whole product.

Report abuse

Follow us


View more