Low-fat diet ‘ineffective’ for long-term weight loss

By Nathan Gray contact

- Last updated on GMT

Low-fat diet ‘ineffective’ for long-term weight loss

Related tags: Weight loss, Obesity, Nutrition

A low-fat diet does not lead to greater long term weight loss than higher-fat diets including low-carb and Mediterranean style diets, finds a large meta-analysis of more than 68,000 adults.

The systematic review, published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology​, pooled data from 53 randomised trials comparing the effectiveness of low-fat diets to other diets for long-term weight loss of least one year.

Led byDr Deirdre Tobias from Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, the research team found that low-fat interventions were no more successful than higher-fat interventions in achieving and maintaining weight loss for periods longer than one year.

"Despite the pervasive dogma that one needs to cut fat from their diet in order to lose weight, the existing scientific evidence does not support low-fat diets over other dietary interventions for long-term weight loss,"​ said Tobias.

"The thinking is that simply reducing fat intake will naturally lead to weight loss. But our robust evidence clearly suggests otherwise,”​ she said.

Ineffective diets?

The Harvard-based team noted that the effectiveness of low-fat diet on weight-loss has been debated for decades, and hundreds of randomized clinical trials aimed at evaluating this issue have been conducted – with mixed results.

The new systematic review of this evidence involved a meta-analysis of 53 randomized clinical trials comparing the long term effect of low-fat and other higher-fat dietary diets – pooling data from 68,128 participants.

The team noted that on average, trial participants across all dietary intervention groups only managed to lose, and keep off, six pounds at one year or longer.

Analysis showed no significant difference in the average weight loss between reduced-fat diets and other diets.

Compared with low-fat diets, participants in low-carbohydrate weight loss interventions were about two and a half pounds lighter after follow-up of at least one year, said the team – who noted that low-fat diets only led to a greater weight loss when compared to 'usual diet' in which participants did not change their eating habits.

"The science does not support low-fat diets as the optimal long-term weight loss strategy,”​ said Tobias. “To effectively address the obesity epidemic, we will need more research to identify better approaches for long-term weight loss and weight maintenance, including the need to look beyond differences in macronutrient composition.”

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Reduce Sugar. Add Fibre. Use VitaFiber™ IMO

Reduce Sugar. Add Fibre. Use VitaFiber™ IMO

LEHVOSS Nutrition– Gee Lawson | 28-Feb-2019 | Data Sheet

VitaFiber™ IMO is a plant-based food ingredient made from tapioca or pea starches and belongs to the special group of carbohydrates called oligosaccharides....

Chicory root fibre for bread improvement

Chicory root fibre for bread improvement

Cosucra Groupe Warcoing SA | 03-Dec-2018 | Technical / White Paper

Fibruline™ Instant chicory root fibres is an excellent source of fibre for white bread production. It can be used with minimal adaptations of the recipe...

Related suppliers

5 comments

Show more

mr

Posted by doug bristor,

What is one experimenter's low fat diet is still a high fat diet to a wholefood plantbased diet.
Dr Greger also looks at many studies highlighting how these meta studies can be skewed by the meat and dairy industries, as meat and dairy inherently contains fat and has money.
http://nutritionfacts.org/topics/low-fat-diets/
Of course half an avocado and an 28grams of walnuts are a good addition to most people's diet.

Report abuse

Offensive picture

Posted by amanda armstrong,

Will you please stop using this ugly picture of a man's deformed feet! use a foot model or someone who has normal toes - this keeps cropping up in my news feed why????!??!?

Report abuse

NWCR hardly convincing

Posted by Angela Meadows,

In response to the comment from Eliezer Greenspan, it would behove proponent of reliable weight loss maintenance to read the small print in the publications from the NWCR. Not least that a significant proportion of participants are regaining and/or dropping out, and that there is no long-term follow-up despite the registry now being over 20 years old.The majority of publications focus on what got people onto the database in the first place, with nothing beyond 2 years post-registration. This database does not deserve the press it gets and is certainly not a reliable source on which to found EBM.

Report abuse

Follow us

Featured Events

View more

Products

View more

Webinars