Animal welfare will be ‘decisive criterion’ for lab-grown meat

By Caroline SCOTT-THOMAS contact

- Last updated on GMT

“We need to make sure people will eat it because otherwise there’s no point,” said Post
“We need to make sure people will eat it because otherwise there’s no point,” said Post

Related tags: Meat, In vitro meat

Most people accept that animals have been slaughtered for meat because they have no choice – but lab-grown meat could change that, says Professor Mark Post.

The Maastricht University professor behind the €250,000 lab-grown burger​, which was unveiled at a public event in London two years ago, spoke at the IFT trade show in Chicago this week about the viability of cultured meat from technological, cost, and ethical perspectives.

“I think it’s pretty realistic to assume we can do this,”​ he said.

He said it would be difficult to ask a burgeoning global middle class to refrain from eating meat altogether. However, if lab-grown meat were more widely available – at a reasonable price – people may find it harder to justify killing animals for food.

“We are very capable of cognitive dissonance. We know that an animal has been killed for it and we accept that because we have no alternative, but if we do have an alternative, you can’t do that anymore,”​ he said. “…I think for consumers, animal welfare is going to be a decisive criterion.”

Indeed, the quest for in vitro meat has gained support from the animal rights group PETA, which offered a $1m prize to the creator of commercially viable in vitro chicken meat in 2008 – a prize that hadn’t been claimed before the deadline in March last year, although researchers have made headway in the area.

“Of course, humans don’t need to eat meat at all​,” PETA said. “…But because many people refuse to kick their meat addiction, PETA wants to help them switch to flesh that doesn’t cause suffering and death.”

What about the €250,000 price tag?

Post told IFT delegates that according to cost modelling, lab meat could feasibly come down in price to a less eye-watering $65 per kilogram once the technology has been scaled up – and even further in the long term.

Currently, Post’s team is culturing meat on a very small scale, in a 1.5-litre bioreactor, but he said the aim was to scale up production to massive 25,000-litre bioreactors. “We know exactly the parameters we have to tweak to get that price down,”​ he said, adding that the researchers were in the process of setting up a company to do just that.

Large-scale production of cultured meat still faces challenges, however, including reproducing the fat cells in meat – and possibly even finding a way to produce omega-3 fatty acids to improve its health profile. The original lab-grown burger was coloured with red beet juice and other ingredients to replicate the red colour of meat, as the original fibres were still yellow, but Post said the research team had since found a way to stimulate myoglobin expression – which creates the pink colour of meat – under low-oxygen conditions.

Serum-free production

The research team also aims to remove reliance on blood products used in the growth medium to improve its sustainability and reduce animal inputs. Compared to raising cattle, Post claims that using a growth medium based on salt water algae could cut land and water use by 90% and energy use by about 60%.

“We also need to make sure people will eat it because otherwise there’s no point,”​ he said.

“First it needs to be more efficient than a cow, then it needs to be internally sustainable. It needs to mimic meat because we are a society that loves meat, not meat replacers.”

The ‘yuck factor’

Critics of the technology repeatedly have asked whether people would actually consume meat produced in a lab – or whether the ‘yuck factor’ might ultimately prevent its success.

Post said: “That’s something that time will heal, that if you have people who are early adopters and will eat something that’s coming out of the lab then it will become more accepted….Kids don’t even blink and ask ‘when can we try it?’”

Market research has been reasonably positive, with 63% of Dutch people saying they are in favour of lab-grown meat.

Referring to hotdogs as an example of a product that people have become used to eating, even if they might find the production process unappetising, Post said: “What’s interesting is that people don’t know what’s in it, but more interestingly they don’t ​want to know what’s in it.”

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Impact of the new Novel Food process on applicants

Impact of the new Novel Food process on applicants

Pen & Tec Consulting Group | 11-Mar-2019 | Technical / White Paper

A year after its implementation, this technical paper questions whether changes to the novel food regulation have brought about positive improvements to...

The Ingredients Show 2019 NEC Birmingham

The Ingredients Show 2019 NEC Birmingham

William Reed | 01-Jan-2019 | Product Brochure

We’ve been bringing food and drink markets together for over 150 years. And the drive to
inform and serve our sectors that fuelled the launch of...

The unrivalled potential of gelatine

The unrivalled potential of gelatine

Gelita AG | 03-Dec-2018 | Data Sheet

Gelatine’s multifunctional technological properties provide product developers with an unrivalled toolbox for current and future food applications. None...

Plant-based alternatives to thrill your tastebuds

Plant-based alternatives to thrill your tastebuds

Tereos Starch & Sweeteners Europe | 25-May-2018 | Technical / White Paper

Tereos has launched a range of delicious, 100% plant-based solutions for the food industry. Sauté Végétal is the first example of this new range of high-protein...

Related suppliers

3 comments

Even if it's just a half-step to meat alternative...

Posted by MoodyFoodie,

This probably lends itself best to replacing "cheap" meats in processed products or ground meats where you are not likely to notice the difference. I can imagine you will not get a steak out of this, and of course not a Thanksgiving turkey! But still I can imagine that this could take over the majority of meat production, with a reduced meat industry supplying actual animal product as a luxury and accordingly priced. With "real meat" becoming a luxury perhaps the welfare standards would also be improved. This would still reduce the scale of animal suffering and reduce the environmental impact.

Report abuse

Use Technology to Improve Animal Welfare

Posted by Zoe Vanderbilt,

Fantastic news! We should ALL voice our support for this! I hope it will bring an end to forcing millions of poor animals to live a miserable life, possibly in a factory farm and ending in a terrifying and violent death.

Report abuse

Food Science for Good!!

Posted by Ron Kendrick,

As a food scientist we seldom get to see a viable alternative that can diminish pain and suffering for those without a voice. I totally applaud this venture!! Great work and great article!

Report abuse

Follow us

Featured Events

View more

Products

View more

Webinars