Low-income families need to spend one third of income to eat healthily

By Niamh Michail contact

- Last updated on GMT

"As food is only one area of expenditure that must be met by households, it is difficult to see how low-income families could afford the cost of the minimum essential [healthy] food basket," says the report.
"As food is only one area of expenditure that must be met by households, it is difficult to see how low-income families could afford the cost of the minimum essential [healthy] food basket," says the report.

Related tags: Food standards agency, Nutrition

Low-income families need to spend at least one third of their weekly income on food if they want to eat healthily, a Food Standards Agency survey has found.

The survey,​ jointly conducted by the Food Standards Agency (FSA-NI), Foodsafe and the Consumer Council in Northern Ireland, asked consumers to select a realistic, healthy food basket that met the family’s taste requirements and included some special food items for visitors and social occasions. University of Ulster nutritionists reviewed the baskets to ensure they met British nutritional guidelines.

They found that the cost of a healthy shopping basket was £59 (€80) for a pensioner living alone and £119 (€162) for a family of four. This equated to 36% of the pensioner's weekly salary if dependent on state benefits and 32% for a low-income family of four.

Sharon Gilmore, head of standards and dietary health at FSA-NI said: "For the first time, we have sound evidence on the real cost of an essential food basket and how food issues relate to poverty and economic hardship.”

Heat or eat?

A parallel FSA-NI report​ ​entitled Understanding food in the context of poverty, economic insecurity and social exclusion​ highlighted a number of factors that were trapping segments of society in a food poverty cycle.

The high cost of eating healthily, declining cooking skills and the fact that other expenses such as energy bills took precedence over food bills meant that people were buying cheaper and less nutritious food.

Government healthy eating campaigns were therefore not falling on deaf ears - rather empty pockets.

One report stakeholder said: “Public health messages about fresh fruit and vegetables and how essential they are for children’s wellbeing – they’re not lost on people. But it’s being able to afford them that’s the problem.”

More money, less food

In 2013 the lowest income households in the UK spent nearly one quarter (22%) more on food than in 2007 – but for this they were able to buy 6.7% less food.

Source: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 201​3

The large proportion of income spent on food meant that consumers closely tracked even the slightest price changes – but especially for the processed foods that they could afford to buy regularly.

One NGO worker interviewed for the report said: “I was meeting people that could tell you the price history on a packet of four blueberry muffins. They could tell you over the period of two or three months what the price fluctuations had been.

“People are [also] getting very savvy about knowing when a ‘special offer’ isn’t a special offer. They’re really watching these things.”

A worldwide trend

The Northern Ireland research confirms findings from a 2015 Lancet Global Health study​ which showed that an increasing dependency on cheap, nutrient-poor processed food can be seen throughout Western nations and, increasingly, middle-income countries such as China and India where obesity problems could begin to eclipse undernutrition.  

annual income food new
Percentage of annual income spent on food worldwide

But the study, which evaluated diet quality in 187 countries for over 4.5 billion adults, found there were still some differences on a smaller regional scale.

“In southern Europe, lower socioeconomic status is associated with higher consumption of fruits and vegetables, possibly reflecting greater domestic production in rural areas,” ​the authors wrote.

Meanwhile, the proportion of annual income spent on food varies worldwide but is typically much smaller in Western countries. US households spend as little as 6.8% of their annual income on food compared with 20% in Poland, according to USDA data from 2008. This rose to between 30 and 50% for African, Asian and ex-USSR countries.

Related news

Related products

show more

Free booklet: Fat extraction for food analysis

Free booklet: Fat extraction for food analysis

BÜCHI Labortechnik AG | 09-Dec-2019 | Technical / White Paper

Fat extraction is a standard reference method for quality control, labeling and satisfying stringent regulations. "The five essentials of fat extraction...

Reduce Sugar. Add Fibre. Use VitaFiber™ IMO

Reduce Sugar. Add Fibre. Use VitaFiber™ IMO

LEHVOSS Nutrition | 11-Oct-2019 | Data Sheet

VitaFiber™ IMO is a plant-based food ingredient made from tapioca or pea starches and belongs to the special group of carbohydrates called oligosaccharides....

Related suppliers

1 comment

Washington State data

Posted by Ciara McCabe,

Great reading.
The infographic highlighting %income spent on food is great. Is there a more up to date one available? Has the 2008 study been replicated

Report abuse

Follow us

Featured Events

View more

Products

View more

Webinars