Don’t challenge UK traffic light label, make it EU-compulsory, MEP tells commissioners

By Annie Harrison-Dunn

- Last updated on GMT

UK MEP says the traffic light label scheme adheres to all points laid out by the EU Food Information to Consumers Regulation
UK MEP says the traffic light label scheme adheres to all points laid out by the EU Food Information to Consumers Regulation

Related tags Traffic light label Nutrition

UK Member of European Parliament (MEP) Glenis Willmott has sent a three-page letter to the Commission saying it should be considering making the UK’s traffic light label a mandatory pan-EU measure, instead of threatening it with court action.

“There are no valid grounds for the challenge, and I am extremely disappointed that the Commission has pursued this case,”​ the leader of the European Parliamentary Labour Party said in her letter to the commissioner​ for internal market, industry, entrepreneurship and SMEs Elżbieta Bieńkowska and commissioner for health and food safety Vytenis Andriukaitis.

Glenis Willmott traffic light MEP

“Obesity is a problem across the whole of Europe, and rather than trying to stop this simple, consumer-friendly and effective labelling system we should be seriously looking at making it mandatory for all processed foods on the single market,”​ she said.  

At the beginning of October the Commission formally opened infraction proceedings against the UK’s voluntary nutrition labelling system, a decision Willmott called “foolish”​. The UK now has until December to defend itself against claims that the scheme creates a boundary to trade, and fails to offer clear and scientifically sound nutritional guidance to consumers.

Prove it!

In the letter she said that statements that the scheme was a barrier to trade must be supported by reliable figures, and added that fears that single ingredient foods like olive oil would be targeted were “completely unfounded”​ since the voluntary label – which ranks sugars, fat, saturated fat and salt by the colours red, yellow or green depending on content based on harmonised references – was used on multi-ingredient food and drinks only.

The Commission said it was concerned that the scheme’s “negative”​ red classification may discriminate against foods like traditional Italian cheeses, which would be likely labelled red for salt and fat content while Italian trade groups pointed out that products like Diet Coke would be given the green light for all three nutrient counts.

Willmott said the scheme was not designed to discriminate against certain products, but simply provide objective information about nutritional content. 

Freedom of expression

shoppingcard uk gov

She said that during the negotiation of the EU Food Information to Consumers Regulation it was made clear that countries could introduce voluntary labelling schemes, or “additional forms of expression”​, providing certain points were adhered to, which she said the UK had done.

The label was an effective and simple way to communicate nutritional information to consumers at a time when obesity was a growing concern, she said, and what’s more it was based on sound research and consultation with a range of stakeholders. The UK’s Department of Health received 191 full responses from NGOs, retailers and local government authorities when it launched its consultation, and the scheme was supported by consumer groups like Which? and the European Consumer Organisation (BEUC).

Based on what?

Meanwhile she said the scheme was based on sturdy research conducted by the UK’s Food Standards Agency which concluded that although levels of comprehension were generally high for all front of pack (FOP) labels, the coexistence of a range of formats in the marketplace caused difficulties for shoppers.

“This suggests that standardising to just one label format would enhance use and comprehension of FOP labels. Overall the balance of evidence from the research shows that the strongest FOP labels are those which combine text (high, medium, low), traffic light colours and %GDA information,”​ FSA said.

Reacting to the publication of the letter, the European Public Health Alliance (EPHA) backed Willmott, pointing to a US study​ that showed the label could positively influence consumer food choice.

“EPHA calls upon the European institutions not to ignore the findings of the new studies and to give due consideration to the public interest of protecting people’s and society’s health and well-being,”​ it said in a statement. 

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Your partner in plant-based meat alternatives

Your partner in plant-based meat alternatives

Content provided by ADM | 15-May-2024 | White Paper

Harness our technical expertise and world-class portfolio of high-quality ingredients and formulations to create elevated, chef-driven, plant-based meat...

Related suppliers

Follow us


View more