Nestlé, ADM and Cargill can’t escape liability for cocoa child slavery, rules court

By Oliver Nieburg contact

- Last updated on GMT

‘The use of child slave labor in the ivory Coast is a humanitarian tragedy,’ and chocolate companies could be held to account, says senior circuit judge. Photo Credit - Make Chocolate Fair
‘The use of child slave labor in the ivory Coast is a humanitarian tragedy,’ and chocolate companies could be held to account, says senior circuit judge. Photo Credit - Make Chocolate Fair

Related tags: Appeal

A US appeal court has ruled that Nestlé, ADM and Cargill can be held to account for aiding and abetting child slavery in Côte D’Ivoire and has allowed a US lawsuit to proceed.

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said last Thursday that the firms may have tolerated child slavery on cocoa farms to keep production costs low.

“Driven by the goal to reduce costs in any way possible, the defendants allegedly supported the use of child slavery, the cheapest form of labor available,” ​said senior circuit judge DW Nelson. He said that the companies controlled the Ivorian cocoa market and instead of using that control to stop slavery, they facilitated it.

The appeal court in December​ last year said that corporations could be sued under the Alien Tort Statute. The claimants were invited to resubmit their case and the latest ruling​ allows the lawsuit to proceed. It means a 2010 district court decision that had dismissed the case on grounds that US courts had no jurisdiction for abuses committed by companies outside US territory has been overruled. 

A panel of three circuit judges in a US Court of Appeals said that the Alien Tort Statute - a US Law that allows foreign citizens to seek remedies in US courts for human-rights violations – applied to corporations as well as states.

By majority, the court allowed the claimants - three former child slaves - to amend their complaint.

'Forced to drink urine'

The lawsuit was originally filed by three individuals from Mali in July 2005, known as John Doe I, II and II. They claim to have been trafficked as children into Côte D’Ivoire in the 1990s and forced to work unpaid on cocoa farms for 14 hours a day.

They said they were fed scraps, were whipped and beaten and locked in small rooms at night. One of the claimants witnessed guards cut open the feet of children who tried to flee and another claimant said that guards forced failed escapees to drink urine.

Child Labor cocoa Source - 10 campaign
Studies by International Labor Organization, UNICEF, and others have found that thousands of children are forced to work without pay in West Africa. Photo credit: 10Campaign

Who’s in control?

Nestlé, ADM and Cargill do not own cocoa farms, but have buyer/seller relationships with the farms to maintain a supply of cocoa.  “We work with farmers and cooperatives to process their cocoa and connect them to world markets."​ Louis de Schorlemer, EMEA Corporate Communications Manage, told ConfectioneryNews.

But Nelson said “…the defendants effectively control the production of Ivorian cocoa,”​ adding that it was the companies’ unilateral goal to find the cheapest source.

He said that doing business with child slave owners did not in itself show purpose to support slavery, but doing so to reduce production costs did.

Inferential leap?

Circuit judge Rawlinson said in a dissenting judgement that although child labor may be the cheapest form of labor for harvesting cocoa, the court should not make an “inferential leap” ​to say that the companies purposely aided and abetting child slavery. She was overruled by two to one.

Slave-free Chocolate

The chocolate industry lobbied against a 2001 US bill that would have required US manufacturers to ensure imported cocoa was ‘slave free’.  A voluntary system was adopted instead.

The 2010 district court decision was reversed and the case has now been remanded to allow the claimants to amend their claim.

While we are disappointed in the ruling, we are confident that we will ultimately prevail in this suit,”​ said Cargill’s De Schorlemer.

Lydia Méziani, senior corporate spokesperson for Nestlé, said: "We continue to believe that the trial court was correct in its 2010 dismissal of this case."

"The appellate court’s decision relates to purely procedural issues and is not determinative of the allegations against Nestlé, which remain unproven. Nestlé follows and respects international law and it does not tolerate illegal or discriminatory labour practices."

ADM spokesperson Jackie Anderson said: "We disagree with the panel’s decision. We are examining the decision and anticipate that the defendants will file an en banc petition with the full Ninth Circuit." ​An en banc session is a where a case is heard before all the judges of a court.

All the companies subject to the lawsuit operate their own cocoa sustainability programs, but have made no commitments to purchase only third party certified cocoa.

Hershey is also facing a US lawsuit​ for alleged complicity in child labor in West Africa. The case launched by Hershey shareholder Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System (LAMPERS) was allowed to proceed in a ruling in March.

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

The Ingredients Show 2019 NEC Birmingham

The Ingredients Show 2019 NEC Birmingham

William Reed | 01-Jan-2019 | Product Brochure

We’ve been bringing food and drink markets together for over 150 years. And the drive to
inform and serve our sectors that fuelled the launch of...

Accelerate your supply chain as pressures intensify

Accelerate your supply chain as pressures intensify

William Reed | 04-Oct-2018 | Technical / White Paper

Food, Drink and Non-Food manufacturers are under pressure. Range reviews, massive retail mergers, the backlash against plastic packaging and the ongoing...

New generation of healthy baking powder

New generation of healthy baking powder

Jungbunzlauer | 14-May-2018 | Technical / White Paper

Jungbunzlauer is presenting a healthy baking powder based on microencapsulated glucono-delta-lactone with sodium or potassium bicarbonate. The combinations...

Does Europe Want to Ban Palm Oil?

Does Europe Want to Ban Palm Oil?

The Oil Palm | 12-Feb-2018 | Business Advice

The European Parliament has voted to ban Palm Oil biofuels under the Renewable Energy Directive. There is one key question the Council of the European...

Related suppliers

1 comment

Political trial of cocoa trade.

Posted by Vero,

If you hold the chocolate companies to account for the state of development in Africa, you might as well hold to account every consumer who eats chocolate as well. Go ahead and ban chocolate, then what will happen to children in the Ivory Coast? Will they suddenly get i-pads and go to school? No, it doesn't work like that. Criminal and incapable African governments are responsible for this situation, not the chocolate manufacturers, who have actually poured millions in time and effort into trying to improve the situation of cocoa smallholders in the Ivory Coast and elsewhere. Basing the trial on this sort of anecdote is nonsense and totally unfair, and the activists know it is.

Report abuse

Follow us

Featured Events

View more

Products

View more

Webinars