EFSA hits back at ‘stricter controls’ call

By Joseph James Whitworth contact

- Last updated on GMT

The deregulation of meat inspection debate
The deregulation of meat inspection debate

Related tags: Meat, European food safety authority

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has hit back at claims from the UK’s largest union which appealed for stricter controls for the agency.

Unison’s call was based on a Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) report which assessed EFSA’s independence.

EFSA wants a risk-based approach to meat inspection and UNISON believes the move could pose a health risk to consumers in the UK and Europe.

EFSA's scientific advice

An EFSA spokesperson told FoodQualityNews.com that it provides independent scientific advice to inform decisions of policy makers about food-related risks.

In 2010, EFSA was asked for scientific advice on the possible introduction of a risk-based approach to meat inspection, at all relevant stages of the meat production chain.

“EFSA identified and ranked public health hazards – biological and chemical – in meat and assessed the strengths and weaknesses of the current inspection methodology.

“EFSA’s experts concluded that current inspection methods do not enable detection of some important hazards and do not differentiate food safety aspects from meat quality aspects.”

No substitute for hands-on inspection

Paul Bell, UNISON national officer for meat inspectors, said there is no safe substitute for hands on meat inspection.

“Inspectors tell us that simply looking at a pig carcass will not deliver the high standards of protection of safety and quality that consumers have a right to expect.
“There is a real danger that ending physical inspection, will lead to meat containing an abscess or tumour getting into the food chain. It will be minced into processed food like sausages and ham and customers will be none the wiser.”

EFSA independence

The CEO report said that despite a recent EFSA policy designed to ensure independence of its scientific panels, over half of the 209 scientists sitting on them have direct or indirect ties with the industries they regulate.

EFSA said the CEO report assumed that experts should have no commercial ties related to any aspect of their remit and as the report authors acknowledge, this is the main factor explaining the results.

“EFSA, however, has a different approach that assesses interests in the context of the role that the expert will assume, the work that they will carry out and the remit of the scientific group,” ​said the spokesperson. 

“Nevertheless, no-one employed by industry or as a full-time consultant can be an expert on an EFSA Panel or Working Group.

“It is also important to remember that EFSA’s opinions are the outcome of collective deliberations, with each expert having an equal say. No one expert can unduly influence the decisions of the panel, and minority views are recorded.”  

Bell said that consumers need to know that any decisions about meat inspection are being made in their best interests and it seems that it is not the case.
“This survey casts many doubts over how the decision to change the inspection regime was made. It cannot be right that such a potential conflict of interest between the EFSA and consumers is allowed to continue.
“In light of this information the government should put any further decisions about meat inspection on hold until tougher controls are made on the EFSA.”

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Bring alive the colours of meat, naturally

Bring alive the colours of meat, naturally

Kancor Ingredients Limited | 27-Mar-2019 | Technical / White Paper

Addition of colour makes food more attractive and appetising. But usage of natural colours always come with technical challenges such as heat stability,...

How to find textural perfection in meat alternatives

How to find textural perfection in meat alternatives

Stable Micro Systems | 25-Mar-2019 | Technical / White Paper

An increase in vegetarian diets has led to a rise in demand for meat alternatives. Replicating the texture of meat is vital to consumer enjoyment, but...

Impact of the new Novel Food process on applicants

Impact of the new Novel Food process on applicants

Pen & Tec Consulting Group | 11-Mar-2019 | Technical / White Paper

A year after its implementation, this technical paper questions whether changes to the novel food regulation have brought about positive improvements to...

Related suppliers

Follow us

Featured Events

View more


View more