Will European sugar users switch to isoglucose when quotas end?


- Last updated on GMT

Isoglucose is normally derived from maize in the United States, where it is known as high fructose corn syrup. In Europe, it is either maize or wheat-derived.
Isoglucose is normally derived from maize in the United States, where it is known as high fructose corn syrup. In Europe, it is either maize or wheat-derived.

Related tags Eu sugar quota High-fructose corn syrup

The success of isoglucose in the EU largely depends on whether food and drink companies decide to make the switch from sugar, says managing director of the European Starch Industry Association Jamie Fortescue.

Currently, the European sugar quota system limits isoglucose production to 5% of the total EU sugar quota, effectively limiting production and access to the sweetener. But in 2017 the limit is set to be lifted, opening the market to isoglucose, also known as glucose-fructose syrup, or high fructose corn syrup in the US.

Fortescue claims that production could increase fourfold in the longer term, under the deal reached in June to scrap quotas as part of Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) reform.

He said: “Production is currently limited to 670,000 tonnes in the EU because of the quotas….The market penetration of isoglucose varies across the world. It is certainly highest in the US where it takes up to 50% of the sugar market. That is not going to happen in Europe, but if you look at Japan, it is up to 20% and that’s certainly conceivable in the EU.”

Fortescue said it was difficult to predict the level of demand for isoglucose in the coming years, as consumer acceptance of the ingredient and manufacturers’ willingness to switch from sugar was still unknown.

However, he added: “We reckon that the potential market in the long term is between two and three million tonnes.”

On the other hand, starch producers are not in a position to increase production quickly.

“We don’t have that spare capacity in existing plants, so either existing plants would need to be expanded or new plants would need to be built,”​ he said.

“…Companies will want to know a little bit more about how this transition might happen, and what the sugar industry might do. I would be surprised if they have already taken the decision to invest in this new market opportunity.”

Interest is certainly there, particularly from the soft drinks sector, he says. Under the quota system, it is the amount of fructose in an isoglucose sweetener that is counted, meaning the more fructose in a glucose-fructose syrup, the more of the quota is used up. Isoglucose used in soft drinks tends to be either 43% or 55% fructose, “which wasn’t interesting to us in the quota environment”, ​Fortescue says, adding that the ice cream industry also has its eye on the ingredient.

“Because isoglucose is a liquid, it is much better suited to a liquid product. There are some technical advantages, but depending on the cereal prices compared to sugar prices there may be a cost advantage too,” ​he said.

Starch production in the EU stands at about 10m tonnes a year, of which about 8m tonnes are from cereals. European isoglucose is either maize or wheat-derived.

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Oat Beta-glucan – Clean Label Texturizer

Oat Beta-glucan – Clean Label Texturizer

Content provided by Lantmännen Biorefineries AB | 21-Nov-2023 | White Paper

In today's health-conscious world, consumers seek transparent labels and natural ingredients.

Sweetening solutions for active nutrition

Sweetening solutions for active nutrition

Content provided by ADM: Innovation that Feeds the Future | 13-Oct-2023 | Case Study

When you add GrainSweet® Liquid Maltodextrin to your active nutrition applications you get the manufacturing efficiencies, cleaner labels and clean tastes...

Related suppliers


Show more

Fructose in Isoglucose is too rapidly absorbed

Posted by Dr. Karl-Otmar Stenger,

There are warnings from Prof. Richard J. Johnson from Denver, Colorado ("The Fat Switch"): The difference between sucrose and HFCS is that in sucrose glucose and fructose are tied covalently. In our gut sucrose has to be split by sucralase. This metobolic step is time consuming. In contrast to glucose rapid absorption of fructose causes depletion of energy stores in cells of liver, gut, and kidneys and metabolic disaster within these cells leading to metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, hyperuricemia, hyperlipidemia (triglycerides), arterial hypertension, kidney disease, etc. depending on the amount and frequency of ingestion. The worldwide epidemic of obesity, diabetes mellitus, etc. is driven by ingestion of too much fructose / increasing amounts. The opening of the EU market for sweet US agricultural products in order to reduce subsidize in the USA is a major danger for the european health system.

Report abuse


Posted by Dmitry,

Both are natural as both are derived from natural sources. IMHO.

Report abuse

"Artificial" debate about what's natural.

Posted by Hans Heezen,

I would argue that sugar is no more natural than iso-glucose. Both are not available in nature in the forms as they are. Both are made from natural sources but require a number of processing steps, before they become available in the forms as we know them.

Report abuse

Follow us


View more