Syngenta challenges EU insecticide ban

26-Aug-2013 - Last updated on 27-Aug-2013 at 14:46 GMT

Do neonicotinoids harm bees? The European Commission has chosen a precautionary approach

Swiss agrichemical firm Syngenta has said it will take the European Commission to court over its decision to suspend the use of a pesticide on crops pollinated by bees.

European member states voted in April to ban the use of three widely used neonicotinoid insecticides for two years, after a European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) report said in January that they may pose a "high acute risk" to pollinators, including honeybees. However, EFSA added that in some cases it was "unable to finalise the assessments due to shortcomings in the available data".

Syngenta’s thiamethoxam insecticide is among the banned substances.

“We would prefer not to take legal action but have no other choice given our firm belief that the Commission wrongly linked thiamethoxam to the decline in bee health. In suspending the product, it breached EU pesticide legislation and incorrectly applied the precautionary principle,” Syngenta chief operating officer John Atkin said in a statement released Tuesday.

The company claims that the Commission’s decision was based on “a flawed process” and “an inaccurate and incomplete assessment” by EFSA, without the full support of member states.

Indeed, the Commission imposed the ban only after a hung vote in the European parliament. Fifteen countries voted in favour of a ban, but this was not enough to form a qualified majority under EU rules.

Some restrictions are already in place for neonicotinoids in France, Germany, Italy and Slovenia. However a previous motion for a two-year moratorium did not attract enough support in March, under the EU's weighted voting system, after the UK and Germany both abstained.

Reacting to Syngenta’s move, Greenpeace spokesperson Mark Breddy said: “The Commission was right to intervene and Greenpeace will continue to campaign actively for the protection of bees. The environmental risks and the threat to agricultural production posed by these pesticides far outweigh any benefits.”

Apart from the three neonicotinoids subject to the temporary ban, Greenpeace said it is also campaigning to remove four other pesticides from the market, “as a crucial first step to move away from intensive farming in Europe.”

Syngenta’s Atkin added: “Modern products like thiamethoxam are essential to address the challenge of increasing European food production and reducing the reliance on imports.”

2 comments

Traditional risk assessments fail to protect the environment

Posted by Henk Tennekes, 30 August 2013 - 07:37 GMT

Regulatory decisions based on current risk approaches are flawed simply because the science underpinning the risk of chemicals is inappropriate in many cases. A fundamental problem is to use one methodology for all compounds, irrespective of their toxic mode of action in organisms. While most toxicants with a generic mode of action can be evaluated by the traditional concentration–effect approaches, a certain number of chemicals, including carcinogens, methylmercury, rodenticides, neonicotinoids and cartap insecticides have toxic effects that are reinforced with time of exposure (time-cumulative effects). The traditional risk approach cannot predict the impacts of the latter chemicals in the environment. New assessment procedures are needed to evaluate the risk that the latter chemicals pose on humans and the environment. Since imidacloprid and other neonicotinoid insecticides have time-cumulative effects on arthropods, the risk of foraging worker bees feeding on tiny levels of residues becomes an issue that cannot and should not be ignored Given that honey bee workers can live up to a few months in winter time, any residue concentration found in pollen will have a lethal effect provided there is sufficient time of exposure.

Report abuse