Eating meat is not like smoking, ASA tells PETA

By Caroline SCOTT-THOMAS contact

- Last updated on GMT

Eating meat is not like smoking, ASA tells PETA

Related tags: Heart disease, Nutrition

Animal rights group PETA has been banned from comparing the health effects of eating meat with smoking risks, the UK’s Advertising Standards Agency (ASA) has ruled.

A PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) poster advertisement featured a toddler smoking a cigar, with the caption "You Wouldn't Let Your Child Smoke. Like smoking, eating meat increases the risk of heart disease and cancer. Go vegan!"

Two people complained that the claim "eating meat increases the risk of heart disease and cancer"​ was misleading, but PETA defended its position, submitting several studies and a factsheet from US non-profit organisation, the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, which recommends avoiding all animal products because they contain cholesterol.

The ASA noted that two of the studies submitted by PETA examined the overall effect of a vegetarian diet –which typically varied in many ways from a non-vegetarian diet – rather than solely cardiovascular risk from eating meat. It also disregarded the factsheet, which it said only reflected one viewpoint, and it noted that another school of thought suggests that it is the mix of fat and carbohydrates in the diet, rather than the amount of cholesterol consumed, that has the biggest impact on blood cholesterol – which is a known risk factor for heart disease.

In its ruling, the ASA said: “We considered that because the ad likened the risks associated with eating any kind of meat to the risks of smoking, consumers would understand from the ad that the connection between eating any kind of meat and the risk of heart disease and cancer had been proven beyond doubt, which was clearly not the case, and we therefore concluded that the ad was misleading.”

The ASA acknowledged that some of the studies submitted did suggest a link between certain dietary patterns – including processed meat consumption in particular – and risk of heart disease or cancer, but they were not conclusive, and did not always examine consumption of all types of meat.

It concluded: “The ad must not appear again in its current form. We told PETA not to imply that any consumption of meat would raise the risk of heart disease and cancer.”

The full ruling is available online here​.

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

How to find textural perfection in meat alternatives

How to find textural perfection in meat alternatives

Stable Micro Systems | 25-Mar-2019 | Technical / White Paper

An increase in vegetarian diets has led to a rise in demand for meat alternatives. Replicating the texture of meat is vital to consumer enjoyment, but...

Impact of the new Novel Food process on applicants

Impact of the new Novel Food process on applicants

Pen & Tec Consulting Group | 11-Mar-2019 | Technical / White Paper

A year after its implementation, this technical paper questions whether changes to the novel food regulation have brought about positive improvements to...

The Ingredients Show 2019 NEC Birmingham

The Ingredients Show 2019 NEC Birmingham

William Reed | 01-Jan-2019 | Product Brochure

We’ve been bringing food and drink markets together for over 150 years. And the drive to
inform and serve our sectors that fuelled the launch of...

Plant-based alternatives to thrill your tastebuds

Plant-based alternatives to thrill your tastebuds

Tereos Starch & Sweeteners Europe | 25-May-2018 | Technical / White Paper

Tereos has launched a range of delicious, 100% plant-based solutions for the food industry. Sauté Végétal is the first example of this new range of high-protein...

Related suppliers

1 comment

Red Meat and Lung Cancer risk

Posted by John Davidson,

Red Meat and Lung Cancer risk

Look at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11557111?dopt=Abstract and you'll find a study showing the excess nonsmokers' lung cancer risk for eating red meat. It's not as strong a link as direct smoking, but obviously a LOT stronger than ETS. The red meat link just for nonsmokers would come to somewhat over 3.0 once the ex-smokers were removed (since the ex-smokers would move toward the 4.9 smoker rate.)


That's a nonsmoker EXCESS risk of more than 2.0 versus the EPA claimed risk of 0.19 for nonsmokers exposed to a lifetime of ETS. The lifetime lung cancer risk (not to even mention all the other more likely digestive cancer risks) for eating red meat is over TEN TIMES HIGHER than the excess risk supposedly caused by constant daily exposure to high levels of secondhand smoke.

Report abuse

Follow us

Featured Events

View more

Products

View more

Webinars