Fat, sugar and texture: ‘It’s always a question of compromise’

By Caroline Scott-Thomas

- Last updated on GMT

What compromises are manufacturers willing to make to improve texture in low sugar and low fat foods?
What compromises are manufacturers willing to make to improve texture in low sugar and low fat foods?

Related tags: Sugar, Nutrition, Food

Reducing fat and sugar brings major textural challenges – and for food and drink makers it is always a matter of compromise, according to head of food innovation at Leatherhead Food Research Dr Wayne Morley.

The most common solutions for adding texture back into a reduced fat or reduced sugar product are still hydrocolloids and starches, for gelling and thickening, and increasing viscosity in the water phase, Morley says, and fibres, such as those from citrus, are also commonly used to add texture.

“Both fat and sugar contribute quite a lot to bulk and mouthfeel and product developers are well aware of that,”​ he told FoodNavigator. “The trend to reduce fat and sugar is obviously going to continue. …With any formulation, it is always a question of compromise.”

There are relatively few novel texturizing ingredients emerging, he says, but suppliers have modified their processes in recent years to provide more robust ingredients with greater functionality, like improved stability in acid conditions or improved heat stability.

“Texture is one of the key organoleptic characteristics of all food products. For some products texture is very important and if texture is seen to be deteriorating then consumers won’t buy it.

“Whether it is just the mouthfeel in a beverage or giving the crunch in a biscuit […] the key thing is that when the product is consumed that it breaks down sufficiently in the mouth to release flavour.”

But texture in reduced fat and sugar products is not necessarily about tricking consumers into thinking that they have the same bulk and mouthfeel as full fat or full sugar foods.

“In many cases consumers don’t notice a difference – or they do notice a difference but they quite like it,” ​he said. “…There is a level of compromise that manufacturers are prepared to make.”

Areas of compromise may include shelf life, stability in processing, and even cost, he said.

Morley added that in the past, food manufacturers had increased sugar content in some products to improve texture when reducing fat, meaning that some ‘low fat’ foods were just as high in calories as the regular versions.

However, following a flurry of media attention, he said “I don’t think they are doing that anymore.”

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Explore the benefits of acacia on digestive health

Explore the benefits of acacia on digestive health

Alland & Robert | 17-Mar-2021 | Technical / White Paper

Consumers are looking for ingredients helping them living a healthy life, and are more and more aware that digestive health is key to global health. Acacia...

Planting Possibilities: Insights

Planting Possibilities: Insights

Ingredion | 16-Mar-2021 | Research Study

A fifth of consumers globally are cutting back on animal-based products or cutting them out completely. This mega-trend is only accelerating as health-conscious...

Deep-dive into improving packaging line efficiency

Deep-dive into improving packaging line efficiency

Sidel Group | 03-Nov-2020 | Technical / White Paper

Ever wondered what is the best way to improve your packaging line performance? Learn about the ins and outs of line regulation and accumulations in 3 steps:...

Related suppliers

Follow us

Products

View more

Webinars