Increasing demand for palm oil resulting in ‘massive carbon dioxide emissions’

By Nathan Gray

- Last updated on GMT

Palm oil demand increases result in massive carbon dioxide emissions

Related tags Oil palm Carbon dioxide

Growing demand for palm oil by the food industry is causing wide-spread rainforest destruction and enormous carbon dioxide emissions, according to new research.

The study reveals that expanding production of palm oil – a common ingredient in processed foods and confectionery products – is driving the destruction of carbon-rich tropical forests in Borneo, leading to huge releases of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

Writing in Nature Climate Change​, US-based researchers from Stanford and Yale universities suggest that the vast deforestation occurring during the development of oil palm plantations in Indonesian Borneo "is becoming a globally significant source of carbon dioxide emissions."

The researchers said the sustainable production of palm oil will require re-evaluation of awarded oil palm plantation leases located on forested lands – around 80% of which are currently unconverted.

Led by Professor Lisa Curran from Stanford, the authors explained that a technique combining field measurements with high-resolution satellite image was used to evaluate carbon emissions for lands targeted for palm oil plantations.

The team used this classification to generate the first comprehensive maps of oil palm plantation expansion in Borneo (also known as Kalimantan) from 1990 to 2010. The team then quantified the types of land that have been cleared for oil palm plantations, and worked out the carbon emissions and sequestration from oil palm agriculture.

"A major breakthrough occurred when we were able to discern not only forests and non-forested lands, but also logged forests, as well as mosaics of rice fields, rubber stands, fruit gardens and mature secondary forests used by smallholder farmers for their livelihoods,"​ said Kimberly Carlson, a Yale doctoral student and lead author of the study.

"With this information, we were able to develop robust carbon bookkeeping accounts to quantify carbon emissions from oil palm development."

Curran and her team said the findings show that allocated oil palm leases “represent a critical yet undocumented source of deforestation and carbon emissions.”

Study details

Curran and her colleagues had initially gathered oil palm land lease records during interviews with local and regional governmental agencies. These records identified locations that have received approval and are allocated to oil palm producers.

They revealed that the total allocated leases spanned about 120,000 square kilometres – an area slightly smaller than Greece. Most leases in the study occupied more than 100 square kilometres – an area slightly larger than Manhattan, the team said.

However the researchers said that around 80% of these leases remained unplanted in 2010.

Using the information from the leases – in combination with land cover maps – the team then estimated the future land-clearing and carbon emissions for already approved but not yet cleared plantations.

The team found that if all of these leases were developed, more than a third of Kalimantan's lowlands would be planted with oil palm by 2020. They said this planned expansion is projected to contribute more than 558 million metric tons of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere in that time.

"These plantation leases are an unprecedented 'grand-scale experiment' replacing forests with exotic palm monocultures," ​said Curran.

"We may see tipping points in forest conversion where critical biophysical functions are disrupted, leaving the region increasingly vulnerable to droughts, fires and floods."


Source: Nature Climate Change
Published online ahead of print, doi: 10.1038/nclimate1702
“Carbon emissions from forest conversion by Kalimantan oil palm plantations”
Authors: Kimberly Carlson, Lisa Curran, Gregory Asner, Alice McDonald Pittman, Simon Trigg, J. Marion Adeney

Related topics Science Sustainability Fats & oils

Related news

Show more

Related product

Related suppliers


Show more

Yet it does

Posted by Jordi,

Honestity mandates us to recognize that a plantation, designed for maximum resource output, and therefore, intending to have a minimum of non-productive external species consuming resources, cannot compare with tropical forest. So, for example, one country can forbid planting palm oil into wild jungle, but not other crops. Then, palm will displace other crops into the jungle. As for the second point (good to see health was left unadressed), regional collapse will happen and in fact is happening and has happened (Aral sea, first world exportation of pollution, a myriad of examples). You must address the big picture, not ask for bad, partial solutions. We need more efficiency, stop depleting natural capital and stop compounded population-consumption growth.

I salute you.

Report abuse

Oil-palm doesn't have to replace tropical forests

Posted by Jurgen Denecke,

Are you seriously thinking that cultivated areas are without biological diversity? There is plenty of wild-live in a corn-field, there is plenty of wild life in a Palm oil plantation, particularly if the palms were planted in an area that was wet grass-land before with some cattle on it, with even less wild-life. We should not categorically condemn a specific oil-manufacturing strategy just because mistakes have been made in some areas in the past. We need more food, more fuel, and more materials in the future. This requires good solutions, and not just a loud shouting minority predicting doom. If you want to offer critique, please offer an alternative solution first...

Report abuse

Yes, why?

Posted by Jordi,

Mr. Denecke:

Oil palm a)razes tropical forest and nullifies its biological diversity b)helps in millions of deaths due to its effects on the circulatory system.

And now back to work. No time to check for soil conservation.

Report abuse

Follow us


View more