Eco-labels could 'overwhelm' consumers - study

By Rod Addy

- Last updated on GMT

Related tags: Nestle

Eco-labels could 'overwhelm' consumers - study
The number of eco-labels seems to be bamboozling consumers and the trade, according to joint research by the International Institute for Management Development and the Ecole Polytechnique de Lausanne.

The study involved canvassing more than 1,000 executives from a range of firms, including Nestlé ; Sara Lee ; Hewlett-Packard ; and Canon on their views about eco-labelling. Results suggest the process has become so fragmented that it is subject to wide-ranging reappraisal by manufacturers.

Duncan Pollard, Nestlé’s sustainability advisor, said: “Fifteen years ago eco-labelling was considered to be the way forward. Now we may be seeing the first serious reappraisal of the conventional wisdom that if you wish to prove you’re sustainable you need a certification logo.”

Respondents listed brand-strengthening, addressing consumers’ sustainability demands and protecting against pressure-group attacks as key benefits of eco-labels, such as the Rainforest Alliance and the Fairtrade logo.

"Substantial scepticism"

But they also expressed what the study calls “substantial scepticism”​ over eco-labels’ enduring credibility and the rigour of the criteria and certification procedures.

The research found continuing fragmentation, consumer confusion and lack of consensus on qualifying criteria are viewed as the greatest challenges to hopes of eco-labelling continuing in its current form.

The findings highlight a desire for improved consolidation and standardization as industry adoption of eco-labelling moves towards saturation.

"Overwhelmed"

The study warns that companies and customers alike risk being “overwhelmed”​ unless there is greater dialogue and cooperation among stakeholders.

IMD Professor Ralf Seifert, the study’s co-author, said: “It’s not just consumers who are confused. Selecting an eco-label has become a highly complex decision for firms.

“The trend towards fragmentation, which is made worse by a lack of consensus over qualifying criteria, is clearly causing ever more opposition and frustration.

"Different challenges"

“The fact is that the initial momentum and high expectations of more than 30 years ago are giving way to different challenges – ones that urgently need to be addressed.”

Dr. Joana Comas Martí, an expert in supply chain environmental management, said: “There’s also a feeling among firms that many eco-label providers launch with good intent but morph into organisations whose desire is to survive rather than serve.

“This raises serious questions about eco-labels’ effectiveness in delivering real outcomes and their potential to help achieve genuine market transformation.”

More than 400 eco-labels are now used across 25 industries.

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Everything about in-container sterilization

Everything about in-container sterilization

John Bean Technologies (JBT) | 01-Nov-2018 | Application Note

JBT has a long history and an extensive track record in thermal processing of packaged food. JBT retorts and sterilizers are renowned for their outstanding...

The new Sidel EvoDECO labelling solutions

The new Sidel EvoDECO labelling solutions

Sidel | 21-Sep-2018 | Application Note

Today labels are key components of any brand marketing mix, allowing manufacturers to differentiate their products and give end consumers the information...

Related suppliers

2 comments

Definition of "eco-label"

Posted by EB,

It would be interesting to see what definition of "eco-label" the researchers have used. I would not consider Rainforest Alliance to be an eco-label for example. It seems like at least the author of this article has succumbed to far too wide a use of the term. If almost anything can be called an eco-label it's not very strange that consumers get confused.

Report abuse

Not much truth in labelling

Posted by DJ,

Consumers have learned not to trust eco-labels, any more then we can trust the often phoney all-natural labels. Even organic products can contain additives, processing and packaging aids, that are actually derived from GM corn. Companies can only succeed in tricking people for a while, then we wise up to their less-than-ethical tactics. Profits before people will always prevail when it comes to the food, non-food, drug and chemical industries. Sadly, when we do find an ethical company that provides safe and healthy foods, they are bought out by the big companies, then the quality suffers when the products are changed.

Report abuse

Follow us

Featured Events

View more

Products

View more

Webinars