France backs aspartame safety but calls for more research

By Shane Starling

- Last updated on GMT

Both EFSA and ANSES say recent studies questioning the safety of aspartame don't warrant a toxicological re-evaluation of the intense sweetener
Both EFSA and ANSES say recent studies questioning the safety of aspartame don't warrant a toxicological re-evaluation of the intense sweetener

Related tags Intense sweeteners Soft drink European food safety authority

French authorities have backed the safety of aspartame after scrutinising two recent studies that linked the intense sweetener with increased rates of cancer and pre-term births.

It said while the two studies which are also under evaluation by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), did not warrant a “toxicological re-evaluation”​ of aspartame, it was nonetheless establishing a working group to further research the risks and benefits of intense sweeteners.

No date has as yet been confirmed for when that group would begin life, the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (ANSES) said.

“The Agency shares the desire of EFSA to study the toxicological risks inherent in sweeteners, in the framework of the European regulations in force, and will contribute to this initiative,” ​it said.

ANSES said the nutritional benefits of sweeteners also needed to be investigated.

“Apart from the specific toxicological issues, the question of the nutritional value of intense sweeteners is frequently raised. In this context, ANSES will be setting up a working group to assess the nutritional benefits and risks of intense sweeteners and the need to draw up recommendations for any vulnerable population groups - including pregnant women - identified in the course of its work.”

The studies

The two studies related to the consumption of aspartame or soft drinks containing aspartame and other intense sweeteners.

One (Soffritti M. et al.)​ found increased rates of lung and liver cancer among Swiss male mice dispensed high doses of aspartame in their feed. ANSES dismissed the findings as possessing, “uncertainties and methodological deficiencies” ​and said it was not therefore possible to transfer the results to human populations.

The other (Halldorsson T.I. et al.) was a large cohort study of 60,000 pregnant women that ANSES acknowledged established statistical links between consumption of carbonated soft drinks and increased risk of pre-term delivery. But, as had the study authors, ANSES said the results did not demonstrate cause and effect and required further study.

EFSA agrees

ANSES’ conclusion echoed EFSA’s own position on the subject, issued in February this year. It concluded that, “the two studies do not give reason to reconsider previous safety assessments of aspartame or of other sweeteners currently authorised in the European Union.”

The EU-approved Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) for aspartame is 40 mg/kg body weight.

EFSA said it was working with ANSES on the matter and was in contact with the authors of the studies to better understand the trial design and results.

“EFSA will also continue to monitor scientific literature that may affect the safety assessment of sweeteners such as aspartame,”​ it said.

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Replace Synthetic Preservatives

Replace Synthetic Preservatives

Content provided by Corbion | 08-Apr-2024 | Insight Guide

With 36% of European consumers wary of food additives, particularly preservatives 1, offering a clean label is crucial. Corbion provides a better way...

Download the Blue Food Innovation Summit Brochure

Download the Blue Food Innovation Summit Brochure

Content provided by Rethink Events Ltd | 28-Mar-2024 | Application Note

The Blue Food Innovation Summit brings together leaders at the forefront of investing in and developing solutions for nature-positive, resilient aquaculture...

Sweetening solutions for active nutrition

Sweetening solutions for active nutrition

Content provided by ADM: Innovation that Feeds the Future | 13-Oct-2023 | Case Study

When you add GrainSweet® Liquid Maltodextrin to your active nutrition applications you get the manufacturing efficiencies, cleaner labels and clean tastes...

Related suppliers


Authorities are wrong

Posted by DAC,

As has been established in studies of aspartame over the years that this substance seems or is thought (has been linked) to cause various malodies in human beings. These authorities whose number 1 function is the protection of the consuming public either have forgotten or worse yet ignore that decree. That they now actively ignore growing evidence that aspartame which contains small/trace amounts of formaldahyde and is processed with formaldahyde should be banned as an ingredient in anything that is consumed by human beings.

When I first became a food inspector back in the mid 70's I was taught that it is better to be safe than sorry. That something had to be proven as safe before it is allowed but somewhere over the years that has changed now it has to be proven unsafe before we disallow it. I suggest that HUMAN BEINGS would be better protected if we went back to the former where things had to be proven safe before we allow their use as food, beverages, medicines etc.

Report abuse

Aspartame: ADI is not safe for human consumption.

Posted by James McDonald,

EFSA states:

"The EU-approved Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) for aspartame is 40 mg/kg body weight."

The fact is that the NOAEL used to ascertain the ADI at 40mg/kg is WRONG.

4000mg/kg of aspartame in RATS is OK for rats eating aspartame, but 400mg/kg -10% methanol in aspartame - could be lethal in man at 343 mg/kg.

An ADI of 40mg/kg cannot be safe for humans,

Report abuse

Follow us


View more