Fruit juice industry welcomes plan to ban sugar

By Mike Stones

- Last updated on GMT

Related tags Fruit juice European union European commission

The European fruit juice industry has welcomed a proposal from the European Commission (EC) to ban the addition of sugar to fruit juices - in line with its policy of reducing added sugars and promoting balanced diets.

The addition of sugar would be allowed only for nectars and some specific products where the labelling specifies the addition of sugar.

Richard Laming, media director of British Soft Drinks Association, told that the proposal would help to end confusion about the sugar content of fruit juices.

“Although at present hardly any products do contain added sugar, and those that do say so clearly on the label, the fact that it is permitted at all can cause some confusion amongst consumers,”​ he said. “The Commission proposal will give everyone confidence that a carton of fruit juice is made 100 per cent from fruit and contains no added sugar.”

Huge majority

A spokesperson for the European Fruit Juice Association (AIJN) told this publication that it needed more time to study the proposal. But the ban is something the industry wanted and the huge majority fruit juice manufacturers do not add sugar, she said.

“This ban would help (to highlight) fruit juices’ positive image as a natural healthy product,”​ she said.

Some fruits, such as cranberry and peach, require the addition of sugar and or honey in order to make nectars, said the spokeswoman.

Market strength

The EU juice and nectars market reached 11.3bn litres last year, confirmed the association. Sales of 100 per cent fruit juice accounted for two-thirds of total consumption at 7.5bn litres.

Nectars with a juice content of 25-99 per cent accounted for 3.8bn litres.

Healthy nature

EC agriculture spokesman Roger Waite told that the proposed directive was in response to industry requests. “One of the drivers has been the industry itself to underline the healthy nature of juice products and we can support that,”​ he said.

The proposal will now be considered by the European Parliament and the member states in council which may be able to reach a decision in 12 months. But, the process may be delayed by a further 18 or 24 months if a second reading is required, said Waite.

Then member states have a further 18 months to transpose the directive into national legislation.

The directive also proposes to include tomatoes in the list of fruits used for fruit juice production.

Related topics Policy

Related news

Show more


Please define 'sugar' carefully

Posted by Chris Colenso-Dunne,

Di, I agree 100%.

This has been the subject of heated debate on the NYT Well blog recently. The ignorance by so many NYT posters about what is meant by “sugar” and whether or not high fructose glucose syrups contain “sugar” is appalling. My guess is the same ignorance is wide spread here in Australia.

At the very least, the term "sugar" needs to include all the different isomers of the monosaccharide pentoses and hexoses, and the disaccharides: hence, fructose, glucose, galactose; sucrose, maltose, and lactose for starters.

The oligosaccharides, tetroses, and trioses should probably also be included in the term for food labelling purposes.

Another simpler way round the problem of ensuring unscrupulous manufacturers don’t try to exploit loopholes in the future legally defined meaning of the term “sugar” would be simply to ban the addition of all known sweeteners to fruit drinks.

If we stick to excluding added “sugar”, then "sugar" should also include so-called naturally occurring sugars such as honey, maple syrup, molasses etc.

Report abuse

Please define 'sugar' carefully

Posted by Di Holdsworth,

If High Fructose Corn Syrup is not also considered to be a 'sugar' then the whole exercise will be a sham.

Report abuse

Follow us


View more