SUBSCRIBE

Breaking News on Food & Beverage Development - EuropeUS edition | Asian edition

Headlines > Science & Nutrition

Junk food could reduce appetite for healthier balanced diet

Despite the study being in rats, the team behind it say results may have implications for people's ability to limit their intake of certain kinds of foods, because the brain's reward circuitry is similar in all mammals.
Despite the study being in rats, the team behind it say results may have implications for people's ability to limit their intake of certain kinds of foods, because the brain's reward circuitry is similar in all mammals.

A diet of ‘junk food’ not only increases weight gain, but could also lead to changes in food preference that include a loss of appetite for a balanced diet, according to new research in rats.

The new study could explain why excessive consumption of unhealthy ‘junk foods’ that are high in sugar salt and fat can change behaviour, weaken self-control and lead to overeating and obesity, say the team behind the paper.

Writing in Frontiers in Psychology, investigated with whether exposure to a ‘cafeteria’ style diet consisting of high fat foods has an impact on the ability of rats to learn about food-associated cues and the sensory properties of ingested foods – finding that such a diet not only makes rats fat, but also reduces their appetite for novel foods, a preference that normally drives them to seek a balanced diet.

“We observed that rats fed a cafeteria diet for 2 weeks showed impaired sensory-specific satiety following consumption of a high calorie solution. The deficit in expression of sensory-specific satiety was also present 1 week following the withdrawal of cafeteria foods,” explained the team, led by Professor Margaret Morris of UNSW Australia. Thus, exposure to obesogenic diets may impact upon neurocircuitry involved in motivated control of behaviour.”

"The interesting thing about this finding is that if the same thing happens in humans, eating junk food may change our responses to signals associated with food rewards," added Morris. "It's like you've just had ice cream for lunch, yet you still go and eat more when you hear the ice cream van come by."

Study details

The team taught young male rats to associate each of two different sound cues with a particular flavour of sugar water – cherry and grape.

After this the team fed the rats on either a healthy control or a cafeteria style diet including pie, dumplings, cookies, and cake. Both sets of rats were then exposed to flavoured water before testing the trained response to cues for that flavour.

In healthy rats, raised on a control diet, Morris and her team found that rats stopped responding to cues linked to a flavour in which they have recently overindulged. This inborn mechanism, widespread in animals, protects against overeating and promotes a healthy, balanced diet, they suggested.

However, rats fed for two weeks on a diet that included daily access to cafeteria foods with 150% more calories caused significant changes in weight and also in feeding behaviour.

According to the researchers, the rats' weight increased by 10%, while they also became indifferent in their food choices and no longer avoided the sound advertising the over-familiar taste. This indicated that they had lost their natural preference for novelty, suggested the team – adding that the change in behaviour even lasted for some time after the rats returned to a healthy diet.

Morris and her colleagues suggested that this sort of ‘junk diet’ causes lasting changes in the reward circuit parts of the rats' brain, for example the orbitofrontal cortex, an area of the brain responsible for decision-making.

They added that their results may have implications for people's ability to limit their intake of certain kinds of foods, because the brain's reward circuitry is similar in all mammals.

"As the global obesity epidemic intensifies, advertisements may have a greater effect on people who are overweight and make snacks like chocolate bars harder to resist,” suggested Dr Amy Reichelt, first author of the paper.

Source: Frontiers in Psychology
Published online ahead of print, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00852
“Cafeteria diet impairs expression of sensory-specific satiety and stimulus-outcome learning”
Authors: Amy C. Reichelt, Margaret J. Morris, R. F. Westbrook 

Subscribe to our FREE newsletter

Get FREE access to authoritative breaking news, videos, podcasts, webinars and white papers. SUBSCRIBE

Post a comment

Comment title *
Your comment *
Your name *
Your email *

We will not publish your email on the site

I agree to Terms and Conditions

These comments have not been moderated. You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment. Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments. If you wish to complain about a comment please use the "REPORT ABUSE" button or contact the editors.

Related products

Live Supplier Webinars

The FoodNavigator Salt Reduction Forum
William Reed Business Media
All supplier webinars