Commission plan to destroy 11m olive trees needs more research, says EFSA

By Caroline SCOTT-THOMAS

- Last updated on GMT

About 12% of olive trees across southern Italy are thought to be contaminated
About 12% of olive trees across southern Italy are thought to be contaminated

Related tags European union European commission

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has said plans to destroy up to 11 million olive trees in southern Italy lack sufficient research, after NGO Peacelink challenged the proposal.

The European Commission had proposed cutting down the trees to halt the spread of the pathogen Xylella fastidiosa – but Peacelink urged it to reconsider, saying the measure would be a great mistake. It claimed that more than 500 olive trees had returned to health after being treated for fungi. Following the NGO’s urging, the Commission asked EFSA for a scientific opinion on its proposal.

“There is no published evidence that fungal disease management will reduce establishment, spread and impact of X. fastidiosa, other than the observation that improved orchard management more generally is beneficial for plant health,”​ EFSA said in its opinion​, in disagreement with Peacelink’s assessment.

“However, EFSA shares the concerns over the situation in olive trees in the affected areas, and fully understands the need for further research on potential options to reduce the risk and damage caused by X. fastidiosa.”

It is the remit of the European and national authorities – rather than EFSA – to decide on a control strategy, but EFSA highlighted gaps in knowledge about different agents thought to be involved in the olive quick decline syndrome, including the leopard moth Zeuzera pyrina, the tracheomycotic fungi, as well as Xylella fastidiosa and the insects that spread it.

Xylella fastidiosa is a bacterium thought to be behind the devastation of 74,000 acres of olive groves across southern Italy. The Commission had proposed emergency control measures to destroy olive trees in the affected area – 12% of which are thought to be contaminated.

No one from Peacelink responded to a request for comment on EFSA’s opinion prior to publication.

Related news

Related products

show more

 Four actionable steps to reduce allergen recalls

Four actionable steps to reduce allergen recalls

Content provided by FoodChain ID | 10-Oct-2023 | White Paper

Failing to mitigate allergen risks has serious consequences - not just for consumer safety, poor allergen procedures can also cause financial losses and...

H&F Pectin: Plant-based alternative to gelatine

H&F Pectin: Plant-based alternative to gelatine

Content provided by H&F – Innovative Solutions for your Product Developments | 12-May-2023 | Application Note

H&F Pectins are excellent as a plant-based alternative to gelatine in many applications.

Related suppliers

Follow us

Products

View more

Webinars